This code quickly summarizes much info, both personal and conlanging-related, about we the sufferers of this time-consuming and rewarding not any longer so secret vice.
Work is underway elsewhere to design a coding-system for individual conlangs, that is not the purpose of this one.
The fine-tuning of categories are presented in tables, the leftmost column being the adjustment-value, the second column the explanation of that value and the rightmost column, if any, the names of originators etc. for that value.
Furthermore, names in [square brackets] in category-headers belong to the originators for that category.
|!||placed after: data undisclosed|
|?||placed after: found no fitting category|
|*||placed after: code does not apply, indifference, neutrality|
|$||placed after: gets paid for it|
|@||placed after: opinion/value varies|
|!||placed before: doesn't understand question, haven't heard of category|
|<||placed between code and adjustment: wannabee rating||Steg Belsky|
Note: not all the possible adjustment values (++++ to ----) are listed for all categories, but of course these lacking intermediate values are there.
Few, if any conlangers can earn a living on their Art. Therefore, money for pens & paper, grammars, dictionaries, food & housing etc. must come from somewhere else.
C plus occupational code (stolen from the Geek Code, with important additions)
|F||Faithworker, that is priest, rabbi, guru...|
|S||Science (Physics, Chemistry, Biology, etc.)|
|SS||Social Science (Psychology, Sociology, etc.)|
|T||Translator/Interpreter (yeah I *know* they are different!)|
|W||Wealthy, doesn't have to work for a living|
Special cases, cannot be combined with any of the above:
|CU||'Undecided'. Doesn't know yet|
|!C||Conlanger of no qualifications. A rather miserable existence, you would think.|
|CAT||Conlanger of All Trades. For those that can do anything and everything.|
I'm studying mainly computer science and linguistics, thus I am CCS/LI. (Not counting my dabbling in comp.ling. here, useful though it was)
Shows level of expertise, or level of interest if not a professional
l plus main discipline (if any):
|§||several of the above, picks and chooses|
|l++++||I am -the- authority on the field (Chomsky would be lc++++)|
|l+++||Spokesperson/fan/true believer :)|
|l++||Writes articles firmly rooted in the tradition|
|l+||Discipline is a tool, just like any other|
|l||Have read a little, know what it is|
|l-||Useless for what I try to show|
|l--||Useless, waste of time, to be ignored|
|l---||Fierce supporter of rival theory|
|l----||I am the main -critic-|
|!l||Not a professional|
I would be !lu+
Has been discussed time and time again, browse the archives.
|A||all (both B and M), a real grizzly!|
|G||goatee||Fabian, Patrick Dunn|
|N||no facial hair|
|?||varies too much, no known term||Sam Bryant|
|A||ambidextrous (uses both equally well)|
|N||no correction needed|
I am cN:R:S:?
Do you consider yourself to be creative or is conlanging your only creative outlet?
|a++++||I am an artist, I live of my art (or try to)|
|a+++||Others consider my work good enough to be on an exhibition or sold|
|a++||I also role play, paint etc. Of course my conlanging benefits|
|a+||I (have) dabble(d) in lots of things, nothing serious, just a hobby|
|a||Conlanging is it.|
|a---||Even conlanging is too much, but I can't stop doing it!|
|a----||I've managed to stop conlanging/conlangers are loonies!|
I am a+, Sally Caves would be a+++
x if female, y if male, z if undisclosed, followed by number of kids or # for 'yes, I have children' and/or:
|!z*||There are no absolutes, society is obsessed with the difference, (insert statement here)|
n followed by exact age or number of completed decades + 'd', colon, and years/decades spent conlanging. Whether pauses are included or not is up to you.
The 'decade' marking is especially suited for conlangers that are, ahum, 39 years old... these may claim three decades :)
I would be n2d:1d
What one actually believes in, not religion invented for the fun of it.
R plus religion:
|X||Christian (unspecified denomination)|
|J||Jewish (by faith, not by heritage)|
|M||Muslim (unspecified denomination)|
|C||I believe in vi/emacs/discordianism/slack/(insert internet-"religion" here)|
|R++||regular church (synagogue, mosque, etc.)-goer|
|R--||haven't gone since childhood|
|!R||I have no religion, this does not apply for me. (Note: this is here for people, like myself, that do not consider atheism and agnosticism to be a faith/belief-system, or lack of one. We do not "believe" that there is no G(g)od, it does -not-, "believe" me, take a leap of faith!)|
|!R*||I fail to see why faith, or the lack of it, has to be branded onto everything and nothing, and furthermore what it has to do with me conlanging.|
What are your views on auxlanging and auxlangers?
|A++++||(insert auxlang here) will save the world!|
|A||Been there, done that, useful experience|
|A--||I am strictly an artlanger, thank you very much!|
|A----||Auxlangers are a wart on civilizations butt!|
What are your views on this the best known of auxlangs?
|E++++||Esperanto is my L1, I live and breathe E-o!|
|E+++||I met my spouse at an E-o convention, we speak it at home|
|E++||I'm member of a club/would like to set up my own|
|E+||I know enough of it to use it, but are not really active|
|E||Have looked it over|
|E-||Not my thing|
|E----||Aigh! E-o does everything wrong! I support (insert auxlang here)|
|L++++||I speak (insert loglang here) fluently! It is great!|
|L+||Making an effort to disambiguate can't hurt...|
|L||Been there done that, useful experience|
|L-||Tried it, didn't like it|
|L----||But... language isn't supposed to be logical! Madness, utter madness!|
N followed by number of languages you are fluent in, mother tongue included; a monoglot would be N1, most of the non-english on the list would be at least N2
What's most interesting/easy to do, the stuff you concentrate on, perhaps neglecting other things in the process.
I followed by:
|d||diachronics, the gradual change of a lang|
To what degree do you make elaborate settings for your lang(s)?
|k++++||I conlang to fill my worlds with voices!|
|k||I balance the time I spend conlanging and conculturing, neither pastime dominates, both are equally interesting.|
|k----||Making a setting for the language is all-important.|
|!k||I don't conculture, for whatever reason.|
What is preferred?
(With thanks to Nik Taylor)
|ia++++||isolating all the way, wohoo!|
|ia+++||some compounds, no inflections|
|ia++||some compounding, very few inflections|
|ia+||only a few inflections|
|ia||a balance is best|
|ia-||only two or three "slots" for affixes|
|ia--||4-6 slots for affixes|
|ia---||lots of slots for affixes, with some incorporation|
|ia----||my lang makes Inuit look isolating! Polysynthetisism rules! I could fit a book in one word.|
Optionally followed by a colon and the degree of fusion: [Nik Taylor]
|:+||some degree of seperatability (like Latin with ama-ba-m, e.g.)|
|:++||no seperatability, some analytical structures|
|:+++||no seperability, few analytical structures|
|:++++||thousands of inflections, all inseparable|
I'd have to say ia---:+ here, as formerly separate affixes have started to fuse on me, the rascals.
|p++++||The only needed syllable-structure is CV!|
|p||a balance is best|
|p----||Georgian is such a nice lang|
|m++++||Oh.. I have made *that* many langs! Yikes|
|m++||I am working on a language family|
|m||Well, I sketch langs to test features, which then might be incorporated into my 'main' lang later|
|m---||I've had some false starts but this is it!|
|m----||This is the one, true lang, and I am faithful to it|
|m*||I don't actually conlang myself, I just like to watch.|
Does other people know that you conlang?
|o++++||I am working to make conlanging a recognized art-form!|
|o||Those who ask, are told|
|o-||It's on a need to know basis|
|o--||My family knows|
|o---||I think my therapist/priest knows...|
|o----||My gosh I hope nobody knows! I'd die if anyone found out, or deny it!|
|P++++||Answers EVERYTHING, singlehandedly stands for half the traffic on the list, and is often to blaim if the limit is reach and thereby the list held.|
|P||Posts an average number of posts|
|d++++||Utterly charming disposition, completely professional tone, a total crack-up all the time, completely helpful and knowlegeable, never saying more than is necessary, reads everyone's minds thoroughly. Lavishes everyone with compliments. (Learns other people's conlangs)|
|d+++||Great sense of humor and helpful most of the time, sometimes doesn't answer questions, doesn't read minds, but definitely a real asset on the list.|
|d++||Has moments of inattention, often doesn't give reliable information, but always apologizes, cracks a joke every now and then; sometimes unintentionally offensive.|
|d+||Gets seduced by a flamewar occasionally, always manages to apologize, sometimes gives good answers.|
|d||ACDC: can go either way, up or down, completely mercurial, affable sometimes but definitely lets the migraine do the thinking at other times.|
|d-||gives agita to others, but not as bad as d--|
|d--||a touchy disposition, watch where you step, likes to pick fights, occasionally hilariously funny|
|d---||hasn't got much to be recommended|
|d----||throw this one off the list.|
|b++++||Has a great conlang and never boasts about it. In fact you have to find it. Makes pungeant, mysterious remarks on the list that have everybody wondering... whose voice was that?|
|b++||Gives helpful information to other people about their conlangs but by always referring to their own.|
|b||You can't say anything on the list that this person isn't saying "as for my conlang I..." At least tries to answer the question.|
|b--||Actually denigrates your conlang and advances own. This is an artificial category, since I haven't actually seen this among artlangers (although I think it has been known to happen on Auxlang--but I'm no authority).(PACE!);-)|
|b---||Worse than b--.|
|b----||Put this person in your delete file.|
Finally, name of the most loved conlang, the best, most satisfactory one, or current main project.
My code would be:
CCS/LI !lu+ cN:R:S:? a+ !z* n2d:1d !R* A-- E- L-- N2 Is k++ ia---:+ p- m o P? d? b+++ ta:ruven